Breaking


Friday 9 June 2017

Rework Railway Timetable for Safety Checks of Tracks: NITI Aayog

Rework Railway Timetable for Safety Checks of Tracks: NITI Aayog

New Delhi: The Railway timetable should be reworked to ensure that workmen get enough time for daily safety checks of rail tracks, a NITI Aayog report has suggested.

The report prepared by NITI Aayog member Bibek Debroy and its OSD Kishore Desai said several high density network (HDN) sections in railway network have capacity utilisation of more than 120 per cent (even up to 150 per cent and beyond for some).

“It is suggested that Ministry of Railways (MoR) considers relooking/redesigning existing Railway timetable.

Timetable should be redesigned in a manner that sufficient margin is available for daily safety checks,” said the report titled Fund Deployment Framework for Rashtriya Rail Sanraksha Kosh (RRSK).

Observing that majority passenger trains do not run to optimal capacities thereby choking the available network, the note said the ongoing network decongestion and expansion projects on HDN routes (doubling, tripling, quadrupling) would surely enhance safety margins.

“However, till the time these projects are commissioned, MoR may consider rationalising trains (by combining few trains; increasing coaches or wagons, rationalising stops) as an alternate approach,” the note pointed out.

Citing data, the report said over the six-year period (2012-13 to 2016-17), th country’s rail network saw a total of 586 accidents.

“These accidents led to 1,011 casualties and left 1,634 people injured,” it said.

Elaborating further, the note said: “Derailments accounted for more than 50 per cent of the total consequential accidents while Level Crossing (LC) related accidents (on both manned and unmanned) accounted for about 40 per cent”.

On a cumulative basis, the data indicates that human failures contribute to about 87 per cent of all accidents while the rest were due to failure of equipment, technology or other reasons, the report said.

Source:RailNews

No comments: